Mobile Health Application Rating Tool

Main Article Content

Sathyasri B., Mahalakshmi V., Janani P., Kanmani Ruby E. D., Kanmanipappa C.


Portable wellbeing ("applications") has quickly multiplied, yet their capacity to improve results for patients stays indistinct. An approved apparatus that tends to applications conceivably significant measurements has not been accessible to patients and clinicians. This venture was to create and start probing a usable, legitimate and open source evaluation apparatus to impartially assess the dangers and benefits of wellness applications. Regardless of this expansion, barely any wellbeing applications have been appeared to accomplish what is seemingly their most significant objective: to improve tolerant results. Numerous applications have all the earmarks of being centered on moderately sound patients, with numerous less being centered on significant expense, high-need patients, or patients with ongoing infections. All things considered, most applications are utilized for brief timeframes and afterward dropped. This is hazardous particularly for patients with constant illnesses who may profit by a more drawn out term insight. We realize that far reaching longitudinal consideration bears the cost of patient’s better results, yet a longitudinal relationship with an application isn't the standard. For example, when present, there is a significant reduction in hemoglobin A1c in type 1 diabetes. Although short-term use may be beneficial, for example, for patients passing and colonoscopy that have colonic prep in the direction of the application, we have not put the disease in a weak state given its large community size and open space for development.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sathyasri B., Mahalakshmi V., Janani P., Kanmani Ruby E. D., Kanmanipappa C. (2021). Mobile Health Application Rating Tool. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 635–651. Retrieved from