Determining Grades and Standard Levels for the Most Important Physical and Motor Abilities of Sepak Takraw Juniors in Iraq
Main Article Content
Abstract
(Sepak takraw) is a game that mixes football and volleyball, it is played on a court similar to a badminton court, in which players have the right to play the ball with any part of the body except the arm and hand. The object of the game is to return the ball to the opponent's court and score a point. Since it is a newly emerging game, all aspects related to it must be studied and covered in order to reach the highest levels, and it is known that each game or sporting activity has its own physical and motor capabilities, which is important to determine the level of technical performance, as the game's abilities contribute to mastering the skills. The importance of research in determining standard levels of physical and motor abilities for young Sepak takraw players to help specialists and those in charge of them in a manner that ensures raising the efficiency of these abilities and thus raising the level of performance. The research aims to:
- Identifying the most important physical and motor abilities of Sepak takraw juniors in Iraq.
- Determining standard levels of physical and motor abilities tests for Sepak takraw juniors in Iraq.
The researchers used the descriptive approach in the survey method for its suitability to the problem and objectives of the research. The research community was identified with (50) junior players of the Specialized School of Sepak takraw, and the tests were a tool for research.
The researchers used the appropriate statistical methods to process the data, and the results were as follows: The most important physical and motor abilities needed by the junior Sepak takraw player are (strength characterized by speed, reaction speed, agility, flexibility, compatibility) and after determining the standard levels of their tests, it was found that: in all abilities tests Physical and motor results of the majority of the research sample were between the two levels (average, acceptable) and in light of the results, the researcher made a number of recommendations.